ejmse.2025.10.02.095

INNOVATIONS IN ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION TESTING: A REVIEW OF THE DOUBLE-ACTION OEDOMETER

European Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, Volume 10, Issue 2, 2025
PDF Full Article,  DOI: 10.36868/ejmse.2025.10.02.95,   pp. 95-108
Published: June 20, 2025

Zakaria OWUSU-YEBOAH 1,*, Mircea ANICULAESI1, Iancu-Bogdan TEODORU1, Irina LUNGU1,
1 Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 67 Prof. D. Mangeron Blvd, RO-700050 Iasi, Romania

* Corresponding author: irina.lungu@academic.tuiasi.ro

Abstract

This study presents an in-depth evaluation of the double-action oedometer (DAO) as an advanced testing apparatus for simulating soil compressibility under near-field conditions. Unlike the classic oedometer, which enforces full lateral confinement and single-direction loading, the DAO introduces a dual-loading mechanism. A large platen simulates preconsolidation pressure σ’p, while a concentric piston does the incremental vertical loads, which in effect allows partial lateral deformation. The objective is to reflect the in-situ anisotropic stress paths so that post-test theoretical corrections could be minimised. Silty clay samples were tested using both the DAO and the classic oedometer. Compressibility parameters Eoed, Cc, mv and av were compared. The DAO results recorded higher stiffness Eoed = 10,867 kPa, reduced strain, and more realistic ei trends. The DAO Eoed in comparison with the classic gives M0 = 1.04, which is lower than the theoretical M0 from the correction coefficient in the NP 112/2014. These outcomes could indicate the overestimation of the M0 in theoretical standards. Additionally, the lower strain and settlement yields from the DAO testing under identical stress levels indicate reduced influence of sample disturbance. The apparatus effectively simulates the natural soil stress history and void ratio evolution. This leads to improved prediction of settlement and more accurate derivation of mechanical parameters used in design. The DAO demonstrates clear benefits for geotechnical modelling, offering a cost-effective alternative to classic and modified oedometers. Its potential for standardization and integration into geotechnical codes is significant.

Keywords: double-action oedometer, soil compressibility, preconsolidation pressure, lateral deformation, oedometer modulus.

References:

  1. Bian, J. S. Shi, S. Q. Qian & L. L. Zeng, Influence of anisotropic consolidation stress paths on compression behaviour of reconstituted Wenzhou clay, Geotechnical Engineering, 168 (2), 2015, pp. 149-159.
  2. Shi, X. Ling & L. Zhang, „Effect of anisotropic consolidation on the volumetric strain of Wenzhou clay,” Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 141, nr. 4, p. 04014122, 2015.
  3. Leroueil & D. W. Hight, „Behaviour and properties of natural soils and soft rocks,” Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils, vol. 1, pp. 29-254, 2003.
  4. Casagrande, „The Determination of the Pre-Consolidation Load,” Proceedings of ICSMFE, vol. 1, nr. 3, pp. 60-64, 1936.
  5. NP 112, „NORMATIV PRIVIND PROIECTAREA FUNDAȚIILOR DE SUPRAFAȚĂ, indicativ NP 112 – 2014,” Bucharest, 2014.
  6. Stanciu & I. Lungu, Fundatii – Fizică și Mecanica Pământurilor [Foundations I – Soil Physics and Mechanics], Bucharest: Editura Tehnică, 2006.
  7. Ilaș, „Study of the Soil Compressibility as a Foundation Soil by Using an Original Apparatus,” ISSMGE, 2017.
  8. Head & R. Epps, Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing, Volume II, 1st ed., Caithness, Scotland: Whittles Publishing, 2011.
  9. EN 1997-2, Eurocode 7: Geotechnical design – Part 2: Ground investigation and testing, 2007.
  10. Terzaghi, R. B. Peck & G. Mesri, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, 3rd ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1996.
  11. Stanciu, L. I., and I. A., „Device for determining mechanical characteristics of soils by axially symmetrical compression tests”. Romania Brevet RO 133293, 2014.
  12. Stanciu & I.-C. Herta, „DOUBLE-ACTION OEDOMETER AND DEVICE FOR FRONT LOADING IN STEPS OF A SOIL SPECIMEN”. Romania Brevet RO 133362, 2018.
  13. Stanciu, I. Lungu, M. Aniculăesi, A. Ilaș, O. E. Colț and F. Bejan, „New laboratory devices for testing soil samples,” Proceedings of the Danube European Conference on Geotechnical Engineering Bucharest, Romania., 2023.
  14. Rowe & L. Barden, „A New Consolidation Cell,” Géotechnique, vol. 16, nr. 3, pp. 162-170, 1966.
  15. Controls, „Oedometer, a front loading. Soil mechanics testing equipment”. Italy 1968.
  16. Matest, „ Oedometer, front loading”. Italy 1986.
  17. ISO 17892-5, Geotechnical investigation and testing – Laboratory testing of soil – Part 5: Incremental loading oedometer test., 2017.
  18. BS 1377-5, Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes – Part 5: Compressibility, permeability and durability tests., 1990.
  19. Olek, „Experimental insights into consolidation rates during one-dimensional loading with special reference to excess pore water pressure,” Acta Geotechnica, vol. 15, p. 3571–3591, 2020.
  20. Cekerevac, L. Laloui L. Vulliet, „Thermal Effects on the Compression Behaviour of Boom Clay,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 55, nr. 8, pp. 1072-1085, 2018.
  21. Arup, „Geotechnical Risk in Climate-Resilient Infrastructure,” Technical Report, 2023.
  22. Ng, B. Menzies & D. Rigby, „Suction-Controlled Oedometer Testing of Unsaturated Soils,” ASCE Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 146, nr. 7, 2020.
  23. Zhou, X. Li & Y. Xu, „Polymer-Based Suction Control in Oedometers,” Géotechnique Letters, vol. 12, nr. 1, pp. 1-8, 2022.
  24. W. Norshakila, A. R. Ahmad Safuan, R. M. Jawed, K. Azman & R. Roslizayati, „Mechanical Behaviour of Cement and Lime-Stabilised Laterite Subgrade at Various Matric Suctions.,” Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, vol. 12, nr. 4, 2024.
  25. Stanciu, I. Lungu, M. Aniculesei, B. Teodoru & F. Bejan, Foundations II Investigation and testing of foundation soils, Bucharest: Technical Publishing House, 2016.
  26. Mesri și Y. Choi, „Settlement Analysis of Embankments,” ASCE JGGE, vol. 111, nr. 4, 1985.
  27. DeGroot, C. Ladd & J. Germaine, „Hydraulic Gradient Oedometer Testing,” ASTM Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol. 39, nr. 5, 2016.